Pat Cummins vs Ben Stokes: 4 Captaincy Lessons from the Ashes

In the world of cricket, few rivalries carry the weight and intensity of The Ashes. It's not just about centuries, wickets, or scorecards — it’s about national pride, mental toughness, and, perhaps most importantly, captaincy under fire. The 2025–26 Ashes series added a fresh chapter to this storied saga, as two very different leaders squared off: Pat Cummins, Australia’s cool-headed tactician, and Ben Stokes, England’s passionate, all-in aggressor.

Both captains came into the series with reputations to uphold and legacies to shape. Stokes, known for his fearless attitude and 'Bazball'-fueled bravery, brought flair and drama to every match. Cummins, by contrast, led with quiet authority, patience, and precise decision-making — the kind that doesn’t make headlines but wins matches. So how did Pat Cummins manage to crack the Stokes code — not once, but repeatedly, in critical moments across the Ashes? In this blog, we’re unpacking 4 captaincy secrets that gave Cummins the upper hand. These aren’t just textbook tactics; they’re lessons in leadership, psychological control, and reading the game like a chessboard. Whether you’re a cricket nerd, a casual fan, or someone who just appreciates smart strategy, these insights will give you a whole new way to view the game. Let’s dive into the brain behind the baggy green — and find out how Pat Cummins outplayed Ben Stokes, one calculated move at a time.

Secret #1 — Reading the Conditions, Not Just the Team Sheet

Cummins’ Smarter Selections: Pace vs Spin Gambits in Perth

The first Test of the 2025 Ashes in Perth was a perfect example of how reading the pitch better than your opponent can shape the entire match. Pat Cummins took a bold step — leaving out his frontline spinner in favor of a four-pronged pace attack. Many questioned the move. But Cummins had done his homework. The WACA-like bounce, coupled with overhead conditions, screamed pace dominance — and the result proved him right.

Mitchell Starc ripped through England’s top order. Josh Hazlewood and Cummins himself extracted brutal bounce. The decision wasn’t flashy — it was clinical. This wasn’t just good bowling; it was captaincy with clarity, understanding the DNA of the pitch and tailoring the attack accordingly. Cummins didn’t just pick his best bowlers — he picked the right bowlers for the conditions.

Why Stokes misread the pitch — and how it backfired?

On the other side, Ben Stokes went with a more balanced XI — opting for a spinner and a part-time medium pacer. It was a gamble based on “coverage,” not confidence. The spin had no bite, and the medium pacers lacked venom on the hard Perth surface. As Australia piled on the runs and England crumbled in both innings, it became clear: Stokes misread the pitch, and Cummins seized that gap.

More than tactics, this was about instinct and prep. Cummins trusted the data, the history, and the feel of the conditions. Stokes trusted balance — but sometimes, balance isn’t brave enough. This moment laid down the tone for the series: Pat Cummins wasn't here to match Stokes move-for-move — he was here to outthink him before the toss was even flipped.

Secret #2 — Using Silence as a Weapon

Calm captains win wars: Perth & Brisbane as case studies

While Ben Stokes is known for animated field changes, fiery celebrations, and mid-over huddles, Pat Cummins often stands quietly at mid-off or mid-on — calm, observant, almost unreadable. But don’t mistake silence for passivity. In back-to-back Tests in Perth and Brisbane, Cummins' quiet style became his most effective weapon. At Perth, even when England’s 7th wicket partnership briefly steadied the innings, Cummins didn’t visibly react — no aggressive bowling changes, no wild field shifts. He simply waited for the pitch to play its part, trusted his bowlers to execute, and allowed pressure to build naturally. Sure enough, England folded.

Brisbane was no different. Under the pink ball in a day-night Test, Cummins rotated bowlers with surgical timing — no fuss, no drama. His restraint forced England into errors. Where Stokes might have tried to break the game open, Cummins suffocated it slowly. This is where Test cricket becomes psychological. Cummins' silence isn’t passive — it’s pressure. A calm field, an unchanged plan, and a confident gaze can do more damage than a screaming appeal.

Contrasting communication styles: Controlled vs Constant

Where Stokes often wears his intent on his sleeve — gesturing, chatting, signaling aggressively — Cummins leads with controlled energy. His messages are short, precise, and often non-verbal. It keeps opponents guessing, teammates focused, and the noise minimal. In high-pressure matches, especially five-day Tests, that calm tone sets a rhythm. Bowlers don’t panic. Fields stay tight. Decisions aren’t emotional. Cummins' style isn’t louder — it’s smarter. That’s the essence of this secret: Silence, when intentional, becomes a signal of strength. While Stokes rallies with emotion, Cummins dominates with discipline.

Secret #3 — Calculated Risk Timing

Holding back the short-ball trap: Lord’s 2023 masterstroke

Test match cricket rewards patience — and Pat Cummins knows it better than most. In the second Ashes Test of 2023 at Lord’s, he gave a masterclass in strategic restraint. With England chasing a tricky target and gaining momentum, most captains would have panicked, switched to aggressive short-pitched bowling immediately. Cummins? He waited.

For almost two sessions, Australia bowled tight lines, stuck to conventional fields, and made England’s batters feel comfortable — perhaps too comfortable. Then, without warning, Cummins unleashed the short-ball trap. Bouncers from Starc and Green began flying in. Fielders moved into catching positions. And wickets fell. Fast. The key here wasn’t just the tactic — it was the timing. Had Cummins gone short-ball too early, England would’ve adapted. By waiting, he ensured it came as a surprise, catching batters off guard and flipping the match. This wasn’t improvisation — it was planned disruption, deployed only when the moment was right.

When to attack — Edgbaston 2023 chase planning

Flip the scenario: now Australia is chasing 281, 227/8 on the board, and defeat looks likely. But here again, Cummins timed his aggression perfectly. He didn’t try to dominate early or go for big strokes. He batted time, soaked pressure, then picked his moments — sweeping, driving, and nudging at exactly the right times to build a steady partnership with Nathan Lyon.

What looked like “holding on” was actually a measured chase strategy. He farmed the strike, chose scoring zones smartly, and turned a high-risk chase into a composed finish. In both cases, Cummins' secret wasn’t flashy innovation — it was knowing when to press the button. Not too soon. Not too late. Just right.

Secret #4 — Psychological Control Over the Long Series

Staying even when Stokes surged — Brisbane & beyond

In long series like The Ashes, it’s not always the team with the flashiest performances that wins — it’s the one that holds its nerve. Throughout the 2025 series, there were moments when England surged. Ben Stokes hit counter-attacking fifties. England’s bowlers found reverse swing. The crowd was roaring. But Cummins never looked shaken.

During the second Test at Brisbane, for instance, England built a dangerous 7th-wicket partnership. The atmosphere shifted. Commentators began talking about a comeback. Yet Cummins remained composed — made no rushed bowling changes, no drastic field shake-ups. He simply adjusted lengths subtly, waited for the new ball, and stuck to his method. Eventually, the breakthrough came. And the match tilted back. This wasn't just about tactics — it was emotional management. Where other captains might try to "respond" to an opposition surge, Cummins trusts the long game. He plays the series, not the session.

Leadership as consistency: how Cummins managed emotions

From press conferences to body language on the field, Cummins exudes a calm, measured presence. No wild celebrations. No finger-pointing. He doesn’t chase headlines or fire back at media criticism. Instead, he offers a consistent tone — supportive of his players, focused on the process, rarely reactive. Over five Tests, that steadiness filters into the dressing room. Players know what to expect. Bowlers feel backed. Batters aren’t over-coached mid-innings. It’s leadership through emotional stability, and in high-pressure series like The Ashes, that becomes a superpower. In contrast, Stokes often wears his emotions on his sleeve — a strength in short bursts, but a potential drain over a drawn-out campaign. Cummins’ stoic approach helped Australia keep its edge — not just physically, but mentally.

Conclusion: Fire vs Ice — Why Pat Cummins’ Calm Cracked the Code

Across five grueling Tests, two very different captaincy styles clashed — and while both had their moments, it was Pat Cummins’ steady hand that steered Australia to a strategic upper hand in The Ashes. Where Ben Stokes thrived on passion, boldness, and in-your-face aggression, Cummins played the long game: reading pitches with clarity, using silence to unsettle, timing his risks perfectly, and controlling the emotional tempo of an entire series. These weren’t just textbook tactics — they were quiet masterstrokes, layered in patience and precision.

We often praise explosive captaincy moments — fiery declarations, dramatic field changes, or big gambles. But as Cummins showed, the real secrets lie in what’s not seen: holding back, staying composed, trusting your prep, and knowing exactly when to act. For fans, players, and aspiring leaders — especially in South Asia, where passion often drives the cricketing narrative — there’s a powerful lesson here: sometimes, it’s the quiet captains who leave the loudest legacy. So tell us: Are you Team Stokes — bold and aggressive? Or Team Cummins — calm and calculated? Drop your thoughts below — and share this blog with your fellow cricket nerds!

Related

All-Time Greatest XI in Cricket History